Kyve Network

Data lake

Proposal Details

Proposal #4

Passed

Proposal title

v1.2.0 Software Upgrade

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

99.99%

Proposal #4 description

v1.2.0
Software Upgrade

PROPOSER: The KYVE Foundation ([email protected])

Proposal Summary

This software upgrade proposal, if passed, would enable full Ledger support for all of KYVE's custom transactions.

Proposal Details

It was brought to the attention of the KYVE Development Team that Ledger needed to be supported for KYVE's custom transactions. After further investigation, it turns out no Amino types were registered (this is how Ledger understands the transaction information). This release resolves this issue but requires an on-chain software upgrade as this is consensus-breaking.

Additionally, this upgrade adjusts the vesting schedules of two KYVE Core Team members. Please see this pull request.

Upgrade Process

When the network reaches the defined upgrade height (1135000), block production on the KYVE network will be halted. Block production will not resume until significant voting power has switched to the new release. Validators can either manually replace the old binary with the new one or utilise Cosmovisor to automate this process.

Voting Options

Voting YES

  • A YES vote on this proposal indicates that the KYVE network SHOULD be upgraded; and that the validators should start running the
    v1.2.0
    release.

Voting NO

  • A NO vote on this proposal indicates that the KYVE network SHOULD NOT be upgraded; and that the validators should continue running the
    v1.1.x
    release.

Voting NO WITH VETO

  • A NO WITH VETO vote on this proposal indicates that the KYVE network SHOULD NOT be upgraded; and that the proposal depositors should be penalised.

Voting ABSTAIN

  • An ABSTAIN vote on this proposal indicates that you decline to give a specific opinion on this proposal while maintaining active governance participation.

Conclusion

The forum discussion for this proposal can be found here.

This upgrade has been tested on the Kaon network (our testnet). You can find the proposal here.

Please note that this proposal follows a template that will later be finalised through a governance discussion around processes.

Proposal #4 overview

Total votes
403
Voters
361
Total deposit
25,000 KYVE

Proposal #4 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1a41Yes
2LefeyYes
3EZ StakingYes
4cyberomanovYes
5X-MenYes
6MantiCoreYes
7StakeLab.zoneYes
8JARVANESYes
94SVYes
10cms-rareYes
11COSMØSTAKEYes
12Chorus OneYes
13Mitchell VenturesYes
14SpecokYes
15navsYes
16MMSYes
17ForboleYes
18DOUBLETOPYes
19DozorkenigYes
20[Sunsetting on July 17 - please redelegate]Yes
21bitdealer91Yes
22Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
23CosmostationYes
24πŸ”₯STAVRπŸ”₯ REStake ONβœ…Yes
25EnigmaYes
26CrosnestYes
27breskulpeak.comYes
28MCB | mcbnodeYes
29AirnodesYes
30ProvalidatorYes
31A-gamingYes
32Frens (🀝,🀝)Yes
33starnodesYes
34R1MYes
35cryptechYes
36SeeYouLaterYes
37Pro-Nodes75Yes
38Decloud Nodes LabYes
39MytsaiYes
40bitsznYes
41bulevarYes
42SUDO_workplaceAbstain
43SudoAbstain
44NodeStakeYes
45π‹πžπ­'𝐬 𝐍𝐨𝐝𝐞 & 𝐔𝐓𝐒𝐀Yes
46CroutonDigitalYes
47Redelegate-to-new-Stakin-nodeYes
48Finoa Consensus ServicesYes
49SUDONo
50StingRayYes
51AlxVoy ⚑ ANODE.TEAMYes
52cagieYes
53JahaYes
54Nodes.GuruYes
55AstraNodesYes
56POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
57cyberGYes
58IONode VietnamYes
59kallenYes
60LiveRaveNYes
61LOA LabsYes
62ECO Stake 🌱Yes
63Node GuardiansYes
64Inter Blockchain ServicesYes
65ZKVYes
66Imperator.coYes
67nodemeisterYes
68Validatrium.comYes
69KolotYes

View: