Cosmos Hub

Infrastructure

Proposal Details

Proposal #957

Passed

Proposal title

AMENDMENT TO #956 - Update the Hub’s stATOM/ATOM POL on Osmosis

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

96.11%

Proposal #957 description

NOTE

This proposal is an amendment to Proposal #956. The amendment is to remove the suggestion of increasing Quasar’s vaults allocation and solely focus on updating the range of the static position.

We recommend that everyone votes No on Proposal #956 and cast their vote on this proposal instead.

Summary

As stATOM redemption rate continuously increases (currently at 1.415 ATOM which surpasses the upper bound of the initial range), the POL position is currently out of range and not earning any swap fees.

This proposal seeks to:

  • update the liquidity range for the Hub’s POL of stATOM/ATOM on Osmosis from the previously set range of [1.0, 1.35] to a new range of [1.1, 1.45].
  • Give the custodians of the position the power to update the position in the future if it goes out of range again.

These changes aim to ensure the efficiency of the Hub’s liquidity in the pool.

Background

In the original proposal #858, the Cosmos Hub community approved the allocation of 900k ATOM to provide liquidity in the stATOM/ATOM pool on Osmosis, with 90% of this liquidity placed within a static range of [1.0, 1.35].

This range was chosen to provide liquidity mostly below the redemption rate of stATOM, which at the time was 1.228.

The rationale behind the initial range was that liquidity is more effective below the redemption rate. However, a buffer above the redemption rate was included to accommodate the continuous increase.

Rationale

As of now, the redemption rate of stATOM has increased to 1.415 ATOM and surpassed the position’s upper range of 1.35. Making the position Out Of Range, which means all assets parked in the pool are in $ATOM ( approx 811,060 $ATOM) and not earning any fees from swaps.

To address this, we propose

  • adjusting the range of the remaining liquidity to [1.1, 1.45]:

    This range will accommodate for the rate increase, maintain most of the liquidity below Stride’s redemption rate all while earning swap fees for the Hub’s liquidity.

  • Give the POL’s custodians the power to update the the position if it goes out of range again:

    This will make sure the position never stays Out Of Range by allowing the custodians to move quickly and eliminating the waiting period of 28 days ( at least) of waiting period associated with governance.

    → Note: This power only concerns performing updates to the range when it’s out. It doesn’t allow any other updates.

    → Note: For records sake, Johnny Wyles will update the community about these updates if/ when they happen by commenting on this discussion/ the initial discussion.

Proposed Implementation

The position is managed by a 3/5 multisig on Osmosis with Zaki Manian, Valentin Pletnev, Joni Z, Masha and Johnny Wyles as signers.

If the proposal passes, signers will have the discretion to implement the suggested changes in order to maximise safety and avoid any sort of market manipulation.

This is in regard to the timeline, number of transaction and size when performing the updates suggested.

Note: Plans to re-route POL deployments through Hydro are currently being voted on. In case the plans are finalized before a favourable outcome to this proposal, the implementation of this proposal will be managed by the Hydro committee.

Voting Options

  • Yes: You’re in favour of updating the liquidity range to [1.1, 1.45].
  • No: You’re against updating the liquidity range to [1.1, 1.45].
  • Abstain: You’re neither for nor against but wish to contribute to quorum.
  • No with Veto: Strongly oppose the proposal and deem it a spam, harmful to the Hub.

Proposal #957 overview

Total votes
28,303
Voters
28,197
Total deposit
250 ATOM

Proposal #957 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1CompassYes
2Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
3Bro_n_BroYes
4TessellatedYes
5DELIGHTYes
6CrosnestYes (0%), Abstain (0%), No (0%)
7BigBrainStakingYes
80base.vcYes
9DSRVYes
10EverstakeYes
11Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
12Informal SystemsYes
13CosmostationYes
14StakeflowYes
15Ztake.orgYes
16Virtual HiveYes
17strangeloveYes
18AllnodesYes
19StakecitoYes
20SG-1Yes
21genznodesYes
22HuginnYes
23S16 Research VenturesYes
24Golden Ratio StakingAbstain
25CrowdControlYes
26node101Yes
27windpowerstakeYes
28ShapeShift DAOYes
29Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
30ChainflowYes
31TeeNodeYes
32BlockPIYes
33PRYZM | StakeDropYes
34StakeLab.zoneYes
35Stake&Relax 🦥Yes
36BlockdaemonYes
37✅ CryptoCrew Validators 🏆 Winner #GameOfChainsYes
38Binary BuildersYes
39SygnumYes
40NodeStake | LottoDropYes
41🐱biglazycat.comYes
42IcyCRO 🧊Yes
43Ubik CapitalAbstain
44Citizen Web3Yes
45Chorus OneYes
46GAMEYes
47BlueStake 🚀Yes
48ZKVYes
49NansenYes
50Inu XYes
51Umbrella ☔Yes
52Kintsugi NodesYes
53DragonStakeYes
54IRISNETYes
55🛡️Bunkerstake.ioYes
56Cypher CoreYes
57PUPMØSYes
58CroutonDigitalNo With Veto
59TTT VNYes
60KilnYes
61Trust NodesAbstain
62Stakely.ioYes
63Nodes.GuruYes
64MeriaYes
65ECO Stake 🌱Yes
66HighStakes.ch | Daily AirdropsYes
67blockscapeYes
68w3coinsYes
69WeStakingYes
70🇨🇭 Vortex.live 🟢Yes
71EnigmaYes
72Cosmic Validator | 100% Uptime & Auto-compoundYes
73Simply StakingYes
74vido.infoYes
7501nodeAbstain
76a41Yes
77AmplifierYes
78KeplrYes
79cosmosrescueYes
80Blocks United | blocksunited.comYes
81Coinage x DAICAbstain
82Architect NodesYes
83Leap WalletYes
84POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
85Smart Stake 📈📊Yes
86#decentralizehk - DHK daoYes
87KalpaTechYes
88FreshSTAKINGYes
89Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
90CryptoDungeonYes
91CEX.IO ValidatorYes
92Swiss StakingYes
93Node GuardiansYes
94KahunaAbstain
95🐹 Quokka StakeYes
96Citadel.oneYes
97Chill ValidationYes
98MoonletYes
99in3s.comYes
100Silk NodesYes

View: