Cosmos Hub

Infrastructure

Proposal Details

Proposal #796

Rejected

Proposal title

Nullify proposal 75

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

53.66%

Proposal #796 description

The cosmos hub has an elegant method for dealing with spam, known as veto. It deals with genuine spam proposals very well. But what does it mean under the hood? Well, what it means under the hood is that you vote for no and you vote for veto at the same time, you’re making two votes. If the tally for veto reaches 33%, the deposit on the proposal is burned and the proposal automatically fails.

Since there is absolutely no way to mandate a definition of spam and everybody is going to interpret that differently and it makes no sense whatsoever to argue about that, I propose that we nullify proposal 75, AND free the authors of governance proposals from writing tedious vote options because those are defined very well in the software. Luckily, our community is more than intelligent enough to interpret on their own, what the vote options do, and the documentation of the vote options is highly effective.

Finally, I believe that it makes sense to require only explaining the yes option, as doing otherwise can land a punter in hot water.

Therefore, to make governance simpler in all ways, and increase participation in governance, and remove the crazy burn two sticks of incense and say 10 hail Marys before approaching Cosmos hub governance to save thyself from Gaia’s proceduralist faction, we should do the logical thing, and require only that YES, be defined. All other vote options are defined by the underlying software and its documentation.

vote YES to nullify proposal 75, require that YES be defined, and use all other vote options as described by the cosmos-sdk.

Proposal #796 overview

Total votes
66,149
Voters
65,110
Total deposit
250 ATOM

Proposal #796 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1ECO Stake 🌱No
2B-HarvestAbstain
3AllnodesAbstain
4EverstakeNo
5HashKey CloudAbstain
6CompassNo
7a41Abstain
8HyperblocksProAbstain
9DSRVYes
10StirAbstain
11LOA LabsAbstain
12P2P.ORG - P2P ValidatorNo
130base.vcAbstain
14blockscapeAbstain
15🙏 uGaenn ⛅No
16Chorus OneNo
17HighStakes.ch | Stake for AirdropNo
18NodeStakeYes
19IcyCRO 🧊No
20ShapeShift DAOAbstain
21ProvalidatorAbstain
22S16 Research VenturesAbstain
23BlockHunters 🎯Yes
24BlockdaemonAbstain
25MoonletAbstain
26Blocks United | blocksunited.comNo
27Chill ValidationYes
28debo[REDELEGATE FROM US]No
29GAMENo
30Cosmos SpacesYes
31StakeLab.zoneNo
3201nodeAbstain
33EnigmaAbstain
34Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝No
35Bro_n_BroAbstain
36CrowdControlNo
37Simply StakingNo
38Informal SystemsNo
39CEX.IO ValidatorAbstain
40CosmostationAbstain
41Coinage x DAICAbstain
42StakeSeeker by BTCSAbstain
43Cosmic Validator | 100% Uptime & Auto-compoundAbstain
44SG-1Abstain
45PUPMØSYes
46ChainLayerYes
47Silk NodesAbstain
48Citizen Web3Yes
49Kintsugi NodesNo
50commercio.networkAbstain
51Imperator.coAbstain
52IRISNETAbstain
53NosNode⚛️Yes
54GATA HUBNo
55🌐 KysenPool Sky ☁️Abstain
56Easy 2 StakeNo
57Virtual HiveYes
58Active NodesAbstain
59Vitwit (Previously Witval)No
60Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
61BlockPIAbstain
62Crypto LionAbstain
63FreshSTAKINGNo
64UNSTAKE/RE-DELEGATENo
65MeriaNo
66Stakely.ioAbstain
67Golden Ratio StakingAbstain
68StakecitoAbstain
69KeplrNo
70BlockpowerAbstain
71coinhall.org 📈🔄Yes
72Zero Knowledge Validator (ZKV)Abstain
73StakeWithUsAbstain
74Node GuardiansAbstain
75ChainUp & NewHuoYes
76HLTYes
77StakinYes
78jabbeyYes
79vido.infoAbstain
80KilnYes
81WhisperNode 🤐Yes
82✅ CryptoCrew Validators 🏆 Winner #GameOfChainsYes
83[SHUTTING DOWN] AUDIT.oneAbstain
84Binary HoldingsYes
85Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
86Oni ⛩️ | Stake for BoostDrop™ 🚀Yes
87BitValidatorYes
88🐹 Quokka StakeYes
89stake.systems | autocompoundYes
90Fanfury | fury.fan | Stake to WinYes
91Ubik CapitalNo
92Nocturnal LabsYes
93dForceAbstain
94CROSSTECHYes
95TTT 🇻🇳Yes
96MultiplexYes
97Architect NodesYes
98in3s.comYes
99windpowerstakeNo
100w3coinsYes

View: