Proposal Details

Proposal #967

Passed

Proposal title

Reduce Staking Subsidy to below Taker Fee Burn Rate

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

86.13%

Proposal #967 description

This proposal reduces the inflationary subsidy of the revenue-based staking rewards to the point where emissions are fully offset by taker fee burns, marking a key milestone of fully sustainable and deflationary OSMO.

Current Status

This proposal forms part of the phased transition outlined in the Tokenomics Roadmap, ultimately targeting a Minimal Viable Emissions model where staking rewards are primarily sourced from real yield. This proposal follows on from Proposal 957, which reduced the staking reward subsidy by half, followed by a monitoring period of at least 21 days. As expected by the nature of the change, over this monitoring period, there was an initial increase in OSMO that unstaked, reducing the amount of stake securing the chain from 45.3% to 43.5%. Since then, unstaking activity has stabilized, returning to the typical churn of 3–6 million OSMO bonded and unbonded per 14-day unstaking period. Chart 1: % OSMO Supply Staked after Proposal 957|690x424 Chart 1: % OSMO Supply Staked after Proposal 957. Source: SmartStake

The decline in the staked percentage was more modest than expected, indicating that Osmosis is still rewarding stakers sufficiently even under the lower subsidy rate.

This proposal continues the process of determining the optimal level of revenue subsidy necessary to ensure the security that Osmosis requires through incremental reductions in emissions.

It takes the critical step of reducing OSMO inflationary minting to be lower than the sustained burn rate from taker fees, with the thesis that a lower but sustainable APR, combined with a deflationary trajectory, may prove more attractive to long-term holders than unsustainable high yields from inflation.

For a full analysis of this methodology, security impacts, and risks, see the initial staking subsidy reduction proposal text.

Proposed Change

The proposed change is as follows:

  • Reduce the token distribution allocated to Staking Rewards from 25% to 8%
  • These diverted tokens are redirected to the Community Pool and remain out of circulation unless actively spent via governance, functioning as a soft burn while preserving the one billion OSMO cap.
  • Governance can choose to fully burn these tokens through a spend proposal to the null address if no alternative use becomes apparent, and this accumulation is viewed as detrimental.

This reduction would result in 10,000 OSMO being minted for security each day, consistently lower than the reliable OSMO burn rate from taker fees of ~11,500 per day since parameters were adjusted. This results in OSMO being deflationary every day from taker fees alone.

Additional burns, such as those from ProtoRev and Top of Block auctions, are then bonus deflation beyond this. ProtoRev has an average daily burn of 2,500 in the last 90 days, and Top of Block burns, such as Proposal 960, total around 850 OSMO/day in USDC. Together with the excess taker fee above that used for the offset results in a typical 3,350 OSMO/day of net deflation.

While the reduction in inflationary emissions is significant, the resulting decrease in staking APR is relatively modest, as more rewards now come from actual protocol revenue. Current staking APR is ~6%, with this proposal reducing it to ~3.7%, comprising ~2.6% from protocol revenue and ~1.1% from emissions.

This headline APR is still comparable to typical government bond yields. While bond rates apply to fiat currencies, they serve as a valuable benchmark for “risk-free” returns. Assuming stakers view OSMO as a value-preserving asset, this rate remains competitive for long-term holders.

Should this cut trigger significant unbonding, the resulting higher share of rewards for remaining stakers will re-equilibrate staking incentives, and governance can revisit parameters if needed.

By pairing sustainable staking returns with a reliably deflationary supply, Osmosis strengthens its long-term value proposition for stakers, holders, and liquidity providers. Chart 2: Osmosis Staking APR composition, past and projected|690x354 Chart 2: Osmosis Staking APR composition, past and projected

Summary of Metrics

MetricValue
Current daily minted emissions30,000 OSMO
New daily minted emissions10,000 OSMO
Avg daily burn (Taker Fees)11,500 OSMO
Avg daily burn (ProtoRev)2,500 OSMO
Top-of-Block potential burn (Avg)~850 OSMO/day
Current Staking APR~6%
Projected Staking APR~3.7%
Forum Post: https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/reduce-staking-subsidy-to-below-taker-fee-burn-rate/3835

Proposal #967 overview

Total votes
2,442
Voters
2,434
Total deposit
6,000 OSMO

Proposal #967 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1PRO DelegatorsYes
2Crypto AssassinYes
3Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
4Simply StakingYes
5ValidatusYes
6CroutonDigitalYes
7Stake&Relax 🦥Yes
8S16 Research VenturesYes
9NansenAbstain
10Active NodesYes
11Bro_n_BroYes
12AllnodesYes
13Informal SystemsYes
14VALIDARIOSYes
15CryptoCrew Validators ✅No With Veto
16Stakely.ioYes
17KahunaYes
18MeriaYes
19Citadel.oneYes
20HighStakes.ch | Daily AirdropsYes
21KeplrYes
22OWALLETYes
23ztake.orgYes
24DELIGHTYes
25QuebecYes
26CosmostationYes
27Cosmos Spaces ☮️💜⚛️Yes
28Swiss StakingYes
29Chorus OneYes
30KalpaTechYes
31Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
32Chill ValidationYes
330base.vcYes
34KleomedesYes
35Leonoor's CryptomanNo
36Blocks UnitedYes
37ObiYes
38bryanlabsYes
39FreshSTAKINGYes
40StakecitoYes
41TessellatedYes
42Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
43Interstellar 🍸Yes
44PoS NodeYes
45GATA HUBYes
46InteropYes
47Trust NodesAbstain
4801nodeYes
49SolidarityNodeYes
50CrowdControlYes
51Silk NodesYes
52NFTSwitch.xyz | Delegate for $SOUL Claim DropYes
53BackBone Labs | Delegate for $SOUL Claim DropYes
54POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
55Node GuardiansYes
56Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
57EverstakeAbstain
58CryptoDungeonYes
59CrosnestYes
60ECO Stake 🌱 | REStake.appYes
61NosNode🔮Yes
62Smart Stake 📈📊Abstain
63Oldcat - airdrop DHK every monthYes
64Imperator.coYes
65node101Abstain
66The_CyberneticsYes
67polkachu.comYes
68Atlas Staking (Autocompound Rewards)Yes
69AutoStake 🛡️ Slash ProtectedYes
70MendelYes

View: