Proposal Details

Proposal #740

Passed

Proposal title

Add 0.01% fee pools to Volume Splitting Groups - OSMO/ETH, TIA/USDC, OSMO/USDC, OSMO/USDT

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

87.44%

Proposal #740 description

This proposal would create new volume-splitting groups to include 0.01% spread pools for incentivized pairings that have a 0.05% pool in dominant use.

Background

This proposal extends the Volume Splitting Groups for existing groupings to include 0.01% Spread Factor pools after promising results from adding 0.01% and 0.00% OSMO/ATOM pools in Proposal 718.

Early results show that since the lower fee pools were included on the 12th of February, there have been beneficial results for Osmosis' incentives sustainability and trader experience with no additional incentives expended.

Lower fee pools within the group have quickly gained a large volume share, catering to over 50% of all ATOM/OSMO trading volume on-chain. As this volume has increased, more incentives have been pulled towards these pools, attracting more liquidity and enabling more volume to pass through these pools.

This, in turn, has led to volumes in this pairing crossing the trend line of volume overall in what was a declining trading volume pair due to the lowered overall fee. Graph of ATOM/OSMO Pairing Volume since VSG implementation

The same Osmosis incentives supplement these lower fee pools as applied previously to higher swap fee pools. However, as the Protocol Taker Fee remains constant with a changing pool spread factor, a greater proportion of trading fees go to the protocol and are either retained in the Community pool or distributed to Stakers. This ratio of fees going to the protocol has rapidly increased in the ATOM/OSMO pairing from where it had leveled off at 57% to a share of 75%.

A primary KPI for the performance of incentives is whether a protocol pays out more for liquidity than it earns in return. While Osmosis has previously crossed the Fee Subsidy rate of 1 overall, meaning that pool liquidity is mainly sustained by swap fees rather than incentives, it still pays out more than is earned by the protocol itself. Implementing these low-fee pools and further incentive optimization initiatives reduces this towards the 1:1 target. Graph of Protocol Revenue Ratio Shares

Importantly, this has resulted in a typical swap fee paid by traders between ATOM and OSMO reducing from 0.18% to 0.14%. By expanding these low-fee pools to other major pairings, the typical swap fee on Osmosis will continue to lower, particularly for multi-hops through these pools onto pools that have not had the volume to sustain a low swap fee pool without incentives or multiple quote asset pairings. Graph of Average Swap Fee for ATOM/OSMO

The complete statistics of the pools within this grouping, which comprise the data behind the charts above, can be found here.

Proposed Groupings

OSMO/STABLE

OSMO/ETH

TIA/STABLE

Forum Thread: https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/add-0-01-fee-pools-to-volume-splitting-groups-osmo-eth-tia-usdc-osmo-usdc-osmo-usdt/2467

Proposal #740 overview

Total votes
32,411
Voters
32,310
Total deposit
1,600 OSMO

Proposal #740 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1Golden Ratio StakingYes
2Simply StakingYes
3Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
401nodeYes
5ValidatusYes
6OmniFlix NetworkYes
7Coinage x DAICYes
8Kalia NetworkYes
9[Beehive]๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ทYes
10Bro_n_BroYes
11ChihuahuaYes
12EverstakeYes
13Silk NodesYes
14Swiss StakingYes
15Chorus OneYes
16DACMYes
17Crypto AssassinYes
18CrowdControlYes
19FreshSTAKINGYes
20Margined ProtocolYes
210base.vcYes
22COSMร˜STAKEYes
23StakecitoYes
24Cypher CoreYes
25Uncle EdYes
26TessellatedYes
27POSTHUMAN ๐Ÿงฌ StakeDropYes
28Ethereal VenturesYes
29QuebecYes
30InterblocYes
31AUDIT.oneYes
32Notional.VenturesYes
33PingYes
34Oni โ›ฉ๏ธYes
35DSRVAbstain
36CryptoCrew Validators โœ…Yes
37#decentralizehk - DHK daoYes
38White Marlin StakingYes
39DAO DAOYes
40Active NodesYes
41Tedcrypto.io ๐Ÿงธ | TedLottoYes
42TienThuatToanYes
43AllnodesYes
44reynisfjaraAbstain
45IcyCRO ๐ŸงŠYes
46PoS NodeYes
47Citadel.oneYes
48ztake.orgYes
49Informal SystemsYes
50CrosnestYes
51TaxiStakeYes
52ShapeShift DAOYes
53๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Vortex.live ๐ŸŸขYes
54Leonoor's CryptomanYes
55Stakely.ioYes
56ChainflowYes
57Lavender.Five Nodes ๐ŸYes
58Node GuardiansYes
59CoverletYes
60ECO Stake ๐ŸŒฑYes
61B-HarvestYes
62blockscapeYes
63AlphaNodes๐Ÿ›ธYes
64MeriaYes
65Trust NodesAbstain
66InteropYes
67ZenscapeYes
68Frens (๐Ÿค,๐Ÿค)Yes
69Nocturnal LabsYes
70KingSuperYes
71WhisperNode ๐ŸคYes
72StakeWithUsYes
73Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
74coinhall.orgYes
75CosmostationYes
76OldcatYes
77in3s.comNo
78White WhaleYes
79Interstellar Lounge ๐ŸธYes
80a41Yes
81Imperator.coYes
82MendelYes
83Smart Stake ๐Ÿ“ˆ๐Ÿ“ŠYes
84d3akash.cloudYes
85KomikuriYes
86strangeloveYes
87SpectrumXYes
88Hathor NodeYes
89polkachu.comYes
90ObiYes
91GATA HUBYes
92Chill ValidationYes
93defiantlabsYes
94AutoStake ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Slash ProtectedYes
95Nodes.GuruYes

View: