Proposal Details

Proposal #724

Passed

Proposal title

Create Volume Splitting Gauges for Native WBTC pools

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

94.36%

Proposal #724 description

This proposal would create new volume splitting gauges for groupings of pools involving native WBTC.

Proposed Groupings

OSMO/WBTC VSG

WBTC/STABLE VSG

ETH/WBTC VSG

These grouping have the typical 0.2% and 0.05% spreads, as well as the 0.01% spread for popular routes as proposed for OSMO/WBTC.axl in Proposal 721

Background

Volume Splitting Incentives gauges were introduced in V20 as a mechanism to divide incentives between pools in proportion to the trades they facilitate. These gauges have been used since to divide incentives between Supercharged pools and the migration-linked Classic pools.

Unlike normal gauges, which only have one destination pool, Volume Splitting Incentive gauges cover a group of pools. Incentives are allocated to this grouping rather than the previous method of allocating to single pool gauges.

The proportion of incentives that go to each pool in the grouping is recalculated every epoch according to the volume that occurred in the pools over the previous day. This allows pools that are generating the most volume per unit of liquidity to increase incentives day on day without waiting for a new incentive proposal to pass.

Volume can be expected to be higher per unit of liquidity in lower fee pools due to lower costs for traders as well as an increased number of times that profitable arbitrage opportunities occur. These gauges will encourage liquidity in high-traffic routes to move to lower-fee pools within the grouping.

As liquidity moves to these pools, the fee per trade is lowered, making Osmosis a more attractive exchange to perform trades on. It also changes the ratio of fee collection between what Liquidity Providers receive and what the protocol receives through the Taker fee.

Example

In a default OSMO/ATOM pool with 0.2% Spread Factor and the default 0.1% Taker fee there is a total swap fee of 0.3%. The Liquidity Providers receive two-thirds of the fees accumulated by that pool, and the Protocol receives a third.

If liquidity migrates to a 0.05% Spread Factor pool, then the total swap fee will be lowered to 0.15%, with Liquidity providers receiving a third of the fees and the protocol receiving two-thirds.

The lower fee pool will have more volume from increased arbitrage opportunities as well as a lower overall fee, helping to attract more traders. This causes the fee generation per unit of liquidity on Osmosis to increase.

Despite this, Liquidity Providers may receive fewer swap fees overall compared to a higher fee pool, so Osmosis Incentives will help cover this gap to encourage liquidity to move to lower fee pools that provide better returns for the protocol itself.

If trading in a pool is limited, as may be the case with most tail assets, there may be little incentive for liquidity providers to accept the lower ratio of fees, and so the volume and incentives will remain in the higher spread factor pool. In the event of a sudden increase in volume then the lower fee pool will adjust at the next epoch to attract more liquidity and make Osmosis a more attractive trading location for the asset pairing.

Forum Thread:https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/create-volume-splitting-gauges-for-native-wbtc-pools/2366

Proposal #724 overview

Total votes
32,997
Voters
32,781
Total deposit
1,600 OSMO

Proposal #724 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1Kalia NetworkYes
2AllnodesYes
3SpectrumXYes
4StakecitoYes
5CrosnestYes
6Tedcrypto.io 🧸 | TedLottoYes
7PRO DelegatorsYes
8ProvalidatorYes
9MerkanYes
10ZenscapeYes
11NosNode🔮Yes
12EverstakeYes
13Bro_n_BroYes
14strangeloveYes
15Simply StakingYes
16Bored Ape ServerYes
17Node GuardiansYes
18ChainLayerYes
19Chorus OneYes
20vido.infoYes
21Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
22InterblocYes
23TessellatedYes
24DACMYes
25GATA HUBYes
26VALIDATRIUMYes
27Citadel.oneYes
28Golden Ratio StakingYes
29binary_holdingsYes
30Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
31Notional.VenturesYes
32Silk NodesYes
330base.vcYes
34MeriaYes
3501nodeYes
36stake.systems | autocompoundYes
37S16 Research VenturesYes
38CosmostationYes
39StakeWithUsYes
40Interstellar Lounge 🍸Yes
41a41Yes
42ValidatusYes
43PoS NodeYes
44Swiss StakingYes
45FreshSTAKINGYes
46Hathor NodeAbstain
47QuebecYes
48Crypto AssassinYes
49Leonoor's CryptomanYes
50OmniFlix NetworkYes
51POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
52Smart Stake 📈📊Yes
53Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
54Stakely.ioYes
55defiantlabsYes
56CryptoCrew Validators ✅Yes
57[Beehive]🇰🇷Yes
58ECO Stake 🌱Yes
59SG-1Abstain
60Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
61Active NodesYes
62Nocturnal LabsYes
63Trust NodesAbstain
64InteropAbstain
65Oni ⛩️Yes
66DSRVAbstain
67B-HarvestYes
68coinhall.orgYes
69in3s.comYes
70Cypher CoreYes
71CrowdControlYes
72AlphaNodes🛸Yes
73WhisperNode 🤐Yes
74ztake.orgYes
75ElectricYes
76Informal SystemsYes
77Nodes.GuruYes
78Coinage x DAICYes
79Uncle EdYes
80Imperator.coYes
81MendelYes
82OldcatYes
83ObiYes
84CoverletYes
85KingSuperYes
86Sr20deYes
87#decentralizehk - DHK daoYes
88blockscapeYes
89ChihuahuaYes
90polkachu.comYes
91Chill ValidationYes
92AUDIT.oneYes
93COSMØSTAKEYes
94CommunityStakingAbstain
95ushakovYes
96AutoStake 🛡️ Slash ProtectedYes

View: