Proposal Details

Proposal #683

Passed

Proposal title

Create Volume Splitting Gauges for Pairings

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

95.98%

Proposal #683 description

This proposal would create new incentive gauges for groupings of pools with the same pairings but different swap fee parameters.

Background

Volume Splitting Incentives gauges were introduced in V20 as a mechanism to divide incentives between pools in proportion to the trades they facilitate. These gauges have been used since to divide incentives between Supercharged pools and the migration-linked Classic pools.

Unlike normal gauges, which only have one destination pool, Volume Splitting Incentive gauges cover a group of pools. Incentives are allocated to this grouping rather than the previous method of allocating to single pool gauges.

The proportion of incentives that go to each pool in the grouping is recalculated every epoch according to the volume that occurred in the pools over the previous day. This allows pools that are generating the most volume per unit of liquidity to increase incentives day on day without waiting for a new incentive proposal to pass.

Volume can be expected to be higher per unit of liquidity in lower fee pools due to lower costs for traders as well as an increased number of times that profitable arbitrage opportunities occur. These gauges will encourage liquidity in high-traffic routes to move to lower-fee pools within the grouping.

As liquidity moves to these pools, the fee per trade is lowered, making Osmosis a more attractive exchange to perform trades on. It also changes the ratio of fee collection between what Liquidity Providers receive and what the protocol receives through the Taker fee.

Example In a default OSMO/ATOM pool with 0.2% Spread Factor and the default 0.1% Taker fee there is a total swap fee of 0.3%. The Liquidity Providers receive two-thirds of the fees accumulated by that pool, and the Protocol receives a third.

If liquidity migrates to a 0.05% Spread Factor pool, then the total swap fee will be lowered to 0.15%, with Liquidity providers receiving a third of the fees and the protocol receiving two-thirds.

The lower fee pool will have more volume from increased arbitrage opportunities as well as a lower overall fee, helping to attract more traders. This causes the fee generation per unit of liquidity on Osmosis to increase.

Despite this, Liquidity Providers may receive fewer swap fees overall compared to a higher fee pool, so Osmosis Incentives will help cover this gap to encourage liquidity to move to lower fee pools that provide better returns for the protocol itself.

If trading in a pool is limited, as may be the case with most tail assets, there may be little incentive for liquidity providers to accept the lower ratio of fees, and so the volume and incentives will remain in the higher spread factor pool. In the event of a sudden increase in volume then the lower fee pool will adjust at the next epoch to attract more liquidity and make Osmosis a more attractive trading location for the asset pairing.

Proposed Groupings

Link to Table

Forum Thread:https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/create-and-incentivise-volume-splitting-incentive-gauges/635

Proposal #683 overview

Total votes
3,753
Voters
3,729
Total deposit
1,600 OSMO

Proposal #683 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1#decentralizehk - DHK daoYes
2KomikuriYes
3Informal SystemsYes
4AlphaNodes🛸Yes
5PRO DelegatorsYes
6Bro_n_BroYes
7StakecitoYes
8EverstakeYes
9Tedcrypto.io 🧸 | TedLottoYes
10MultiplexYes
11Interstellar Lounge 🍸Yes
12S16 Research VenturesYes
13DELIGHTYes
14AllnodesYes
15jabbeyYes
16[Beehive]🇰🇷Yes
17iqlusionYes
18Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
19Silk NodesYes
20binary_holdingsYes
21Uncle EdYes
22Chorus OneYes
23Chill ValidationYes
24OldcatYes
250base.vcYes
26NosNode🔮Yes
27DACMYes
28White Marlin StakingYes
29Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
30ztake.orgYes
31Crypto AssassinYes
32stake.systems | autocompoundYes
33PRYZM | StakeDropYes
34ChainLayerYes
35FreshSTAKINGYes
36ValidatusYes
37Swiss StakingYes
38Coinage x DAICYes
39Node GuardiansYes
40InteropAbstain
41Trust NodesAbstain
42Kintsugi NodesYes
43Klub StakingYes
44CosmostationYes
45TaxiStakeYes
46ShapeShift DAOYes
47NotionalYes
4801nodeYes
49🇨🇭 Vortex.live 🟢Yes
50KalpaTechYes
51ForboleYes
52InterblocYes
53Secure SecretsYes
54Stakely.ioYes
55ChainflowAbstain
56openbitlabYes
57WhisperNode 🤐Yes
58Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
59Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
60DSRVAbstain
61ProvalidatorYes
62CoverletYes
63ZenscapeYes
64ECO Stake 🌱Yes
65B-HarvestYes
66CryptoCrew Validators ✅Yes
67COSMØSTAKEYes
68blockscapeYes
69Active NodesYes
70AutoStake 🛡️ Slash ProtectedYes
71Simply StakingYes
72MeriaYes
73AUDIT.oneYes
74vido.infoYes
75OmniFlix NetworkYes
76KingSuperYes
77StakeWithUsYes
78QuebecYes
79coinhall.orgYes
80a41Yes
81in3s.comYes
82Citadel.oneYes
83PoS NodeYes
84Hathor NodeAbstain
85GATA HUBYes
86Leonoor's CryptomanYes
87Cypher CoreYes
88POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
89ChihuahuaYes
90ObiYes
91Imperator.coYes
92polkachu.comYes
93ushakovYes
94CrowdControlYes
95CommunityStakingYes
96Nodes.GuruYes
97kooltek68Yes
98Smart Stake 📈📊Yes

View: