Proposal Details

Proposal #682

Passed

Proposal title

Set Osmosis-Specific costs to USDC equivalents

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

99.76%

Proposal #682 description

This proposal would signal the adjustment of all parameters specifying fees for permissionless but gated tasks specific to Osmosis to be a more stable value.

Background

Currently, three Osmosis-specific tasks can be performed permissionlessly by paying a fee in OSMO to the Community Pool.

Pool creation, Last modified in Proposal 669 to be 400 OSMO

Creating or adding to a gauge, Implemented in V11 at 50 OSMO and 25 OSMO, respectively.

Both of these costs are designed to be a deterrent to spam whilst also allowing the permissionless use of these features and yielding a small revenue for the community pool.

At the time of setting, these costs were approximately

  • Create Pool: 100 USD
  • Create Gauge: 50 USD
  • Add to Gauge: 25 USD

However, as OSMO price varies over time, these prices at this setting have ranged from:

  • Create Pool: 90 USD - 216 USD
  • Create Gauge: 11 USD - 82 USD
  • Add to Gauge: 6 USD - 41 USD

Proposal

This proposal signals that costs for Osmosis-specific tasks can be set in an alternative denom decided by governance that is part of the txfee whitelist. This would then be converted to an equivalent OSMO quantity required in order to perform the message on chain.

This proposal signals that this denom should initially be set to USDC via Noble at implementation, and the message costs to be adjusted to:

  • Create Pool: 100 USDC
  • Create Gauge: 50 USDC
  • Add to Gauge: 25 USDC

This maintains a more constant value cost for each message as OSMO price fluctuates.

Non-Osmosis-specific transactions, such as Governance deposits, are not directly covered in this proposal as they are part of the Cosmos SDK, although this proposal signals that this would also be desired.

Accepting non-OSMO assets as payment for these fees is also not directly covered in this proposal but will likely be part of a future proposal.

Forum Thread: https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/set-osmosis-specific-costs-to-usdc-equivalents/622

Proposal #682 overview

Total votes
4,329
Voters
4,257
Total deposit
1,600 OSMO

Proposal #682 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1Stakewolle.com |100% InsuranceYes
2CrosnestYes
3Bi23 LabsYes
4AlphaNodes🛸Yes
5Kalia NetworkYes
6PRO DelegatorsYes
7Uncle EdYes
8Chorus OneYes
9binary_holdingsYes
10Simply StakingYes
11stake.systems | autocompoundYes
12Nocturnal LabsYes
1301nodeYes
140base.vcYes
15ProvalidatorYes
16NotionalYes
17jabbeyYes
18KomikuriYes
19InteropYes
20Informal SystemsYes
21Stakely.ioYes
22Tedcrypto.io 🧸 | TedLottoYes
23KalpaTechYes
24Bro_n_BroYes
25QuebecYes
26ValidatusYes
27Cypher CoreYes
28Oni ⛩️Yes
29White Marlin StakingYes
30StakeWithUsYes
31Coinage x DAICYes
32EverstakeYes
33Node GuardiansYes
34CryptoCrew Validators ✅Yes
35Kintsugi NodesYes
36CosmostationYes
37NosNode🔮Yes
38PingYes
39B-HarvestYes
40DELIGHTYes
41Vitwit (Previously Witval)Yes
42Hathor NodeYes
43DACMYes
44ChainLayerYes
45FreshSTAKINGYes
46Swiss StakingYes
47The_CyberneticsYes
48defiantlabsYes
49Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
50ZenscapeYes
51Smart Stake 📈📊Yes
52OldcatYes
53Crypto AssassinYes
54MeriaYes
55CoverletYes
56blockscapeYes
57Imperator.coYes
58Citadel.oneYes
59a41Yes
60Chill ValidationYes
61Active NodesYes
62in3s.comYes
63AUDIT.oneYes
64vido.infoYes
65#decentralizehk - DHK daoYes
66PoS NodeYes
67S16 Research VenturesYes
68DOUBLETOPYes
69coinhall.orgYes
70DSRVYes
71ztake.orgYes
72InterblocYes
73TaxiStakeYes
74GATA HUBYes
75🇨🇭 Vortex.live 🟢Yes
76Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
77Leonoor's CryptomanYes
78ECO Stake 🌱Yes
79StakecitoYes
80ChainflowYes
81ushakovYes
82openbitlabYes
83ObiYes
84ChihuahuaYes
85Interstellar Lounge 🍸Yes
86polkachu.comYes
87AllnodesYes
88Trust NodesAbstain
89OmniFlix NetworkYes
90WhisperNode 🤐Yes
91POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
92CommunityStakingYes
93KingSuperYes
94Nodes.GuruYes
95AutoStake 🛡️ Slash ProtectedYes
96kooltek68Yes

View: