Proposal Details

Proposal #1005

Failed

Proposal title

Alloyed BTC: Increase WBTC Variant Caps to 75%

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

84.64%

Proposal #1005 description

This proposal would increase the maximum allocation cap per WBTC variant within the Alloyed BTC asset to 75%.

The change is intended to allow variants of WBTC to be more readily exchanged within the Alloy, as they have consistently been close to the limit since the previous reduction, resulting in the Alloy being less liquid for intra-alloy swaps, particularly when withdrawing one WBTC variant in exchange for another.

Background

WBTC variant caps were lowered in Proposal 963 to reduce exposure to WBTC within the Alloy, which led to routing issues through the Alloy, prompting a partial reversion of that reduction in Proposal 966.

Eureka-based variants have seen increasing adoption and stable usage patterns across all alloys, with variant caps recently increased for ETH and USDT in Proposal 1001. However, the current caps limit the Alloyโ€™s ability to reflect user preferences, increasing friction during use.

Proposal Details

VariantCurrent UsageCurrent CapProposed Cap
WBTC45%50%75%
WBTC.eth.axl48%50%75%
WBTC.eth.atom6%10%75%
Total WBTC limit99%100% (110%)100% (225%)

Details on current liquidity, composition, and cap levels can be found on the Alloyed Asset Dashboard

Risk Considerations

  • A 75% cap still prevents a single variant from achieving full dominance in the event of an issue with one variant. IBC rate limits are also applied to all WBTC variants as an additional security measure.
  • Relative exposure to Eureka is increased. No incidents have occurred during Eurekaโ€™s operation to date, and caps remain under governance control should conditions change. A moderation subDAO may also temporarily freeze movements in and out of the Alloy while a security issue is assessed.
  • Exposure to both Axelar and Native WBTC increases under this proposal; exposure was previously at these levels before the reduction in Proposal 963, without incident.
  • Total WBTC exposure in the Alloy is already effectively 100%; this proposal redistributes variant limits rather than introducing new asset exposure.

Forum Post: https://forum.osmosis.zone/t/alloyed-btc-increase-wbtc-variant-caps-to-75/3990

Proposal #1005 overview

Total votes
1,271
Voters
1,261
Total deposit
6,000 OSMO

Proposal #1005 votes

#

Validator

1stakebeast
2Parakeet
3Cypher Core
4Inotel
5Blockzilla | Staking ๐Ÿš€
6Larry Engineer
7artifact
8XYZ
9Haetaeone
10METAONE
11SG-1
12ShapeShift DAO
13Informal Systems
14jabbey
15iqlusion
16Provalidator
17REDELEGATE | CLOSING 01/07/23
18Lavender.Five Nodes ๐Ÿ
19AiRTX & 0xV
20Simply Staking
21Stakewolle.com |100% Insurance
22Anther
23Imperator.co
24onboarding-test-2
25HBMETAONE
26DexTrac
27AIR DROP STATION
28DSRV
29Redelegate
30Chandra Station
31Another.Software | $ASVT Airdrops to delegators
32Haetae
33Stir
34Ping
350base.vc
36Gidorah
37Chihuahua
38Binary Builders
39Sunseting, please redelegate | Forbole
40Leonoor's Cryptoman
41Figment
42Sentinel dVPN
43Coinage x DAIC
44Cosmostation
45Allnodes
46Stargaze.zone (โœจ,๐Ÿ”ญ)
47BouBouNode
48StakeLab.zone
49Nodeify
50SmartNodes
51Golden Ratio Staking
52Oasis
53ECO Stake ๐ŸŒฑ | REStake.app
54SAS-South Atlantic Staking
55Ledger by Figment
56Citadel.one
57Extra Rewards | NodeOf Cosmonauts - OSMOSIS๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿš€
58CosmosPug ๐Ÿ’
59Ethernodes
60Nodeist
615.0 Validator
62test-validator
63Twinstake
64Interstellar ๐Ÿธ
65edenTest
66Tedcrypto.io ๐Ÿงธ | TedLotto
67eXion
68SCV-Security
69๐Ÿ” The Chicken Coop ๐Ÿฆ Homestead
70DOUBLETOP
71StakeTown
72openbitlab
73Stakeflow
74Sr20de
75Mendel
76Lumina
77Go
78IcyCRO ๐ŸงŠ
79skynodejs
80BackBone Labs | Delegate for $SOUL Claim Drop
81Kahuna
82Margined Protocol
83NFTSwitch.xyz | Delegate for $SOUL Claim Drop
84CryptoDungeon
85Booga Beras
86Mad Scientists
87Stake Shark
88Chainscope
89Kitkat by EVIA
90DKCMC
9101node
92Xilodyne
93REDELTGATE
94NexuSecurus
95[Shutting down - please redelegate]
96NodesHub
97H4LAB

View: