Proposal Details

Proposal #474

Passed

Proposal title

Modify fee tier thresholds and discounts

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

72.57%

Proposal #474 description

This proposal seeks to change the thresholds and discounts for various fee tiers, which are based on a user's staked INJ and total trading volume over the previous 28 days.

  • If passed, there will be no changes for fee tier 0 or 1.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 2 will decrease from 25 to 5 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 3 will decrease from 100 to 10 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 4 will decrease from 150 to 50 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 5 will decrease from 375 to 100 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 6 will decrease from 1000 to 250 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 7 will decrease from 2500 to 1000 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same. In addition, the taker discount for tier 7 will increase from 35% to 40%.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 8 will decrease from 5000 to 2500 INJ, but trading volume will stay the same. In addition, the taker discount for tier 8 will increase from 40% to 50%.

  • The staked INJ threshold for fee tier 9 will decrease from 7500 to 5000 INJ, and trading volume will decrease from 100,000,000 to 50,000,000. In addition, the taker discount for tier 9 will increase from 45% to 60%.

  • Finally, the taker discount for tier 10 will increase from 50% to 70%.

  • By voting

    YES
    on this proposal, you support changing the fee tier thresholds and taker fee discounts.

  • By voting

    NO
    on the proposal, you do not support changing the fee tier thresholds and taker fee discounts

  • By voting

    NO WITH VETO
    , you find this proposal to be spam/irrelevant/malicious, and support burning the 100 INJ deposit if No With Veto votes are greater than a third of the total voting power

  • By voting

    ABSTAIN
    , you wish to contribute to quorum while formally declining to vote either for or against the proposal.

Disclosure: I am a member of the Injective Labs team.

Proposal #474 overview

Total votes
2,980
Voters
2,963
Total deposit
100 INJ

Proposal #474 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1Stakewolle.com | Auto-compoundYes
2TokenStation.appYes
3Oni | Stake for BoostDropβ„’ πŸš€Yes
4Ledger by Chorus OneAbstain
5Chorus OneYes
6WhisperNode 🀐Yes
7CosmostationYes
8Dora FactoryYes
9DecentrioYes
10Lavender.Five Nodes 🐝Yes
11POSTHUMAN 🧬 StakeDropYes
12βœ… CryptoCrew ValidatorsAbstain
13gumiYes
14StakecitoYes
15Cosmic Validator | Top Uptime & Auto-compoundAbstain
16BwareLabsYes
17Stakely.ioYes
18Citadel.oneYes
19PFC - Plan For ChaosYes
20White WhaleYes
21Coinage x DAICAbstain
22Talis ProtocolYes
23Neptune FoundationYes
24CrosnestAbstain
25Imperator.coYes
26HighStakes.ch | Daily AirdropsYes
27AllnodesYes
28Frens (🀝,🀝)Yes
29TwinstakeAbstain
30KilnYes
31EverstakeYes
32NTT DigitalAbstain
33A41Yes
34kingnodes πŸ‘‘Yes
35coinhall.org πŸ“ˆπŸ”„Abstain
36ForboleYes
37FelixYes
38Golden Ratio StakingAbstain
39B-HarvestYes
40ECO Stake 🌱 | REStake.appYes
41Hoss Army by 01nodeAbstain
42SCV-SecurityYes
43TTT VNYes
44AutoStake πŸ›‘οΈ Slash ProtectedYes
45Hex TechnologiesAbstain
46Trust NodesAbstain
47PartnerStaking | Timeworx.io AirdropYes
48Dojo | Delegate for AirdropAbstain
49Smart Stake πŸ“ˆπŸ“ŠAbstain
50polkachu.comYes
51KrakenAbstain

View: