Juno Network

Smart Contracts

Proposal Details

Proposal #51

Passed

Proposal title

Implement a fee-sharing mechanism

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

97.19%

Proposal #51 description

TL;DR

Implement a fee-sharing mechanism, where half of the transaction fee of a smart contract execution will go to the contract’s recipient address which is defaulted to the creator address, and the other half will go to stakers as per usual. The proposed mechanism can potentially become a permanent incentive source for developers based on the raised user activity, in the form of executions, towards their developed smart contract.

Introduction

Junø is the go-to smart contract zone in the ecosystem, due to its permissionless interoperability and lively community. One of the main keys to grow and expand the core value of a smart contract platform is reflected by the applications and projects built on it, besides to the developers/contributors. Therefore, we intend to seek ways and methods to attract healthy development on Junø and promote the effectiveness behind adopting our platform to launch web3 applications. Such methods included offering grants, Hack Juno rewards, or community-pool based funding approved via governance. But what if the chain offered built-in incentives for development on Junø? Will it attract further development and contributors to begin landing on Junø?

Contributor Fee-Based Incentives

The proposed solution is constructed around rewarding developers based on the overall user interest in what has been developed, which is potentially a longterm continuous reward. For each smart contract, there will be a fee recipient address which is defaulted to the creator address. The fee split parameter would be configurable via governance. As of now, we propose a 50/50% split. For each transaction which executes the smart contract, 50% of the transaction fee is distributed to the fee recipient address. The remaining 50% is distributed to stakers. This mechanism allows developers to be fairly rewarded as long as their development is raising activity and users are transacting with their smart contract. Fee distribution will not require voting or permission, and acts as longterm potential revenue, which can attract more developers to build on Junø.

How Contributor Incentives can commend DAOs

One of the optimistic outcomes will be the integration between DAO treasuries and on-chain smart contracts, where the treasury address can be the contract’s fee recipient address to receive fee-based incentives. For example, JunoSwap can set the RAW DAO treasury as the contributor address, where 50% of the fees collected by JunoSwap transactions will be automatically received by the RAW DAO.

Postscript

This is a signaling proposal to evaluate the community’s interest in the proposed “Contributor Fee-Based Incentives” mechanism. Accordingly, the dev team will begin working on the implementation. The proposed mechanism will not reduce or exclude the presence of other incentive programs such as Hack Juno, grants, or governance-approved funding.

Voting

  • By voting YES on this proposal, you agree that the fee sharing mechanism should be implemented.
  • By voting NO on this proposal, you disagree that the fee sharing mechanism should be implemented.
  • By voting NO WITH VETO, you disagree that the fee sharing mechanism should be implemented, and additionally intend to contribute towards proposal rejection and burning of proposal deposit if NoWithVeto votes are greater than a third of voting power.
  • By voting ABSTAIN, you decline to give an opinion on the proposition.

Proposal #51 overview

Total votes
15,102
Voters
14,828
Total deposit
1,000 JUNO

Proposal #51 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1Please redelegate to Bro_n_BroYes
2S16 Research VenturesYes
3Neta DAOYes
4AUDIT.oneYes
5HashKey CloudYes
6WetezYes
7CosmostationYes
8ShuttingDownYes
9SmartNodes 🛡 Slash ProtectedYes
10PlurigridYes
11AllnodesYes
12ECO Stake 🌱Yes
13Stakewolle.com | Auto-compoundYes
14StakecitoYes
15ProvalidatorYes
16coinhall.org 📈🔄 Data/Charts for JunoYes
17polkachu.comYes
18Validator.run | 100% Slash ProtectedYes
19jabbeyYes
20Citadel.oneYes
21Simply StakingYes
22Cosmos Spaces ☮️ 💜 ⚛️Yes
23Stake Frites 🥩 🍟Yes
24OmniFlix NetworkYes
25STC CapitalYes
26Stakely.ioYes
27Coinage x DAICYes
28Domerium LabsYes
29Kintsugi NodesYes
30🙏 uGaenn ⛅Yes
31kingnodes 👑Yes
32chainvibesYes
33COSMØSTAKEYes
34CrosnestYes
35please redelegateYes
36Please Redelegate to other validatorYes
37Imperator.coYes
38milkstakeYes
39STAKECRAFTYes
40Nodes.GuruNo
41NosNode🔮Yes
42BlueStake 🚀 | 100% insuranceYes
43CosmologyYes
4401nodeAbstain
45DisperzeAbstain
46FreshSTAKINGYes
47Stake&Relax 🦥Yes
48strangeloveYes
49GATA HUBYes
50Bi23 LabsYes
51BlockdaemonYes
52This node will go down, please redelegate asapYes
53Klub Staking - SHUTTING DOWN - Redelegate to MeriaYes
54ChainToolsYes
55stake.systemsYes
56Informal SystemsYes
57Cosmic Validator | 100% MEV revenue to Juno stakers! & Auto-compoundYes
58Active NodesYes
593stakes.comYes
60BitValidatorYes
61Silk NodesYes
62windpowerstakeYes
63SG-1Yes
64POSTHUMAN∞DVSYes
65junovaloper1c53el6jh90cu99wyc5rx60zymqd8svxfc6ll5fYes
66web34everYes
67needlecastYes
68StakinYes
69Chill ValidationYes
70Cypher CoreYes
71KingSuperYes
72CrypteloidYes
73SG-1 does blowjobs for spare changeYes
74notionalYes
75a41Yes
76SpacePotatoYes
77dForceYes
78BlockpowerYes
79StakersYes
80MessiAbstain
81Shutting Down RedelegateYes
82DO-NOT-DELEGATEYes
83☉ MercuryYes
84WeStakingYes
85Regenerator | Green Validator 🌱Yes
86KleomedesYes
87Gelotto 🛡 Slash ProtectedYes
880base.vcYes
89Oni ⛩️Yes
90StakeLab.zoneYes
91elsehowYes
92[ block pane ]Yes
93Secure SecretsYes
94LOA LabsYes
95NacionCrypto - ParcerosYes
96InterblocYes
97OldcatYes
98Smart Stake 📈📊Yes
99✅ CryptoCrew - 100% MEV revenue to Juno stakers! #IBCgang #REstakeYes
100CommunityStakingYes

View: