Crescent

Orderbook DEX

Proposal Details

Proposal #267

Passed

Proposal title

Increase the Deposit Amount for Crescent Governance - Parameter Change

Submit time

Deposit end time

Voting start time

Voting end time

Tally result

100.00%

Proposal #267 description

Increase the Deposit Amount for Crescent Governance

Authors: Simply Staking

Current Overview

Over the past couple of months, the network has been hit by a constant stream of 'spam' or 'malicious' proposals. As validators and community members alike, we have been constantly voting NoWithVeto (NWV) to ensure that the proposer's tokens are burned.

Currently, the cost to put a proposal on-chain is around $60 (2000 CRE * ~$0.03c). This amount clearly has not deterred any of these proposals from going live.

##New Changes

We at Simply Staking are proposing:

  • Increase the Minimum Deposit to 7500 CRE. This would increase the value from $60 to $225 for a proposal to go live.
  • Decrease the Max Deposit Period down from 5 days to 1 day. This would ensure that any spam proposals would not filter out any useful proposals that might require a deposit.

We are hopeful that the proposed changes will help mitigate the malicious proposals from going live and protect the network participants from putting their funds at risk.

Please note: We will monitor the price and parameter and adjust in the future if necessary through another governance vote.

##Voting

  • By voting YES, you agree that the minimum deposit for a proposal to enter the voting period should be increased from 2000 CRE to 7500 CRE and that the deposit period should be dropped to 1 day.
  • By voting NO, you disagree that the minimum deposit for a proposal to enter the voting period should be increased from 2000 CRE to 7500 CRE and that the deposit period should be dropped to 1 day.
  • By voting ABSTAIN, you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.
  • A 'NoWithVeto' vote indicates a proposal either (1) is deemed to be spam, i.e., irrelevant to Crescent Network, (2) disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or (3) violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently set out by Crescent Network governance.

Proposal #267 overview

Total votes
213
Voters
208
Total deposit
2,000 CRE

Proposal #267 votes

#

Validator

Account Address

Options
1BlockHunters 🎯Yes
2jabbeyYes
30base.vcYes
4blockscapeYes
5Frens (🤝,🤝)Yes
6Coinage x DAICYes
7ForboleYes
8FoxinodesYes
9Shutdown - please redelegateYes
10PLEASE REDELEGATE | Stakely.ioYes
11REDELEGATE ASAPYes
12node101Yes
13CosmostationYes
14Cosmos CatsYes
15StakeflowYes
16noneYes
170% fees 🚀 | BlueStakeYes
18Bro_n_BroYes
19✅ CryptoCrew Validators #IBCgangYes
20ProvalidatorYes
21🙏 uGaenn ⛅Yes
22YTWOFUNDYes
23DSRVYes
24GPSYes
25Klub StakingYes
26AutoStake 🛡️ Slash ProtectedYes
27StakeLabYes
28Stakin | Discontinued | RedelegateYes
29PUPMØSYes
30Stakewolle.com | Auto-compoundYes
31polkachu.comYes
3201nodeYes
33Imperator.coYes
34Nodes.GuruYes
35Kintsugi NodesYes
36Simply StakingYes
37Crypto Lion 🦁Yes

View: